Announcing the Call for Effective Technology grant program! Click here to learn more and apply.
2025 Call for Effective Technology
Frequently Asked Questions
General Program Questions
-
What is the Call for Effective Technology (CET) program?
The Call for Effective Technology (CET) program identifies and supports the development, implementation, and evaluation of promising AI-powered and educational technology tools that enable high-dosage tutoring, personalized learning, and instructional effectiveness for public school students. Our focus is on improving academic outcomes in mathematics and reading while ensuring equitable access across diverse student populations.
The program provides grants of between $150,000 – $250,000 to support implementation of technology solutions during the 2025-26 school year, alongside a matched research partner, in order to evaluate effectiveness.
-
What are the key objectives of the CET program?
The CET program aims to:
- » Support the development and implementation of innovative AI and educational technology solutions
- » Study and evaluate these tools in authentic educational settings
- » Shape evidence-based policies and quality standards for AI and tech integration in education
- » Identify equity-focused interventions that demonstrate potential to improve outcomes for underserved students.
- » Advance a culture of evidence-first decision-making in the rollout of AI and educational technologies.
-
What makes the CET grant program unique?
The CET program is specifically focused on educational technology solutions, with a particular interest in AI-powered tools. Unlike programs that support concept development or early-stage ideas, CET requires applicants to have existing tools or solutions that will be ready for use in real school settings during the 2025-26 school year.
Additionally, CET includes a strong research component, with all grantees working with an Accelerate-assigned research partner to evaluate usability, feasibility, and effectiveness.
Application Questions
-
What is the application process like?
The application process consists of:
- » Completing an Eligibility Form to determine if your organization qualifies
- » Submitting a full application (for eligible organizations)
- » Participating in an interview (for selected applicants)
The full application includes sections on:
- » Organizational information and background
- » Problem-solution overview (upload a demo or provide a link)
- » Equitable access
- » Implementation plan
- » Data collection and evaluation
- » Additional information
-
What is the timeline for application and selection?
Tuesday, May 27th, 2025: Application available
Friday, June 13, 2025: Application deadline
Friday June 20, 2025: Selection of applicants for interviews and notification
Monday, June 23 – Thursday, July 3, 2025: Interviews (30 mins)
July 2025: Award notifications
August 2025: Grant award finalization and research partner match for grantees
September 2025: Start of grant award year
September 2026: End of grant award year -
What does the demo or visual representation of our solution need to include?
The application requires a demo or visual representation of your solution (under 5 minutes). This can be:
- » Demo video
- » Simple screen recording showing basic functionality
- » Slideshow with screenshots and explanation
- » Walk-through using prototype or wireframe tools
- » Narrated PowerPoint or presentation
The focus should be on showcasing the user experience and core functionality of your solution. Production value is not a factor in the evaluation.
-
Do we need to have district partnerships already in place to apply?
While having confirmed district partnerships is not an absolute requirement to apply, it is preferred. If selected as a grantee, you will be required to secure letters of commitment from partner districts before grant disbursement. These letters must confirm:
- » Support for implementation during the 2025-26 school year
- » Agreement to participate in research/evaluation activities
- » Willingness to timely share relevant student-level data with grantee
The application asks about the status of your district partnerships:
- » Yes – confirmed partnerships with signed partnership agreement/MOU
- » Yes – confirmed partnerships without signed partnership agreement/MOU
- » In discussion – partnerships likely but not yet confirmed
- » No – still seeking district partner(s)
Preference will be given to applicants with confirmed partnerships.
-
What are the minimum implementation requirements?
Your proposed implementation must serve a minimum of 100 students during the 2025-26 school year, across at least two partner districts (or with a strong rationale for single-district implementation).
Implementation can occur at any point during the school year, and flexible implementation periods are acceptable (e.g., 6-week design sprints, semester-long pilots, or full-year implementations).
-
What if we’re unable to implement in two districts?
The eligibility requirement is a minimum of 100 students across at least two partner districts, or with a strong justification for single-district implementation. If you have a compelling rationale for why your solution should be implemented in a single district, you can provide this explanation in your application.
Grant and Funding Questions
-
What may grant funding be used for?
Awarded funds may be used to support:
- » Program implementation
- » Technology development and adaptation
- » Costs related to evaluation activities
The funds are meant to be flexible to promote the project goals while providing grantees with maximum flexibility.
-
Is there a cap on indirect costs?
Yes, up to 5% of the grant amount may cover indirect costs.
-
Does the grant cover the cost of research and evaluation?
All CET grantees will be matched with an Accelerate external research partner, who will be funded separately through Accelerate, and should not budget for this expense. If there are additional research-related expenses such as support staff time, please include it in the proposed budget.
Research and Evaluation Questions
-
What does the research component of the grant entail?
All grantees will work with an Accelerate-assigned external research partner focused on designing and conducting an evaluation study. These studies may examine:
- » Usability: How effectively can students and/or teachers use the tool?
- » Feasibility: How practical is the tool to implement in authentic educational settings?
- » Initial evidence of effectiveness: What impact does the tool have on relevant educational outcomes (e.g., student achievement)?
-
What will be expected of grantees regarding research and evaluation?
Expectations for all grantees include:
- » Partner with Accelerate’s external CET research partner
- » Share access to implementation data, achievement/assessment data, and internal metrics
- » Participate in regular check-ins with Accelerate and CET research partner about implementation
- » Allow access to internal team and external / district partners for research activities (interviews, observations, etc.)
- » Share internal reports or dashboards already in use by the organization
-
What types of data will we need to share with the research partner?
- Implementation data examples include:
- » Usage statistics (time spent, features used, completion rates)
- » User engagement patterns
- » Student progress through content/activities
- » Teacher utilization rates
- » Technical performance metrics
- » Support ticket themes/frequency
- Internal metrics examples include:
- » Student learning progress
- » Results from any A/B testing
- » User satisfaction scores
- » Teacher feedback data
- » Student assessment results
- » Adoption/retention rates
- External metrics examples include (where available and applicable):
- » NWEA MAP
- » iReady
- » Star Renaissance
- » End of Year state exams
- » District benchmark assessments
- Implementation data examples include:
-
What support will the research partner provide?
Accelerate’s external research partner(s) will:
- » Partner with grantees to design research study (e.g., implementation or impact evaluation)
- » Identify evaluation approaches, leveraging data that is already available or being used internally by grantee organizations, and including external assessment data, where applicable
- » Conduct data analysis and re-analysis, offering a second layer of technical support to grantee organizations
- » Provide regular thought partnership and feedback to grantees
- » Participate in Accelerate’s Research Learning Community to share individual and cross-cohort insights
- » Create grantee final report and findings to be shared publicly
-
How will privacy and data protection be handled?
Grantees will need to:
- » Share de-identified student-level data with the Accelerate-assigned external research partner at regular intervals
- » Secure data sharing agreements with partnering school district(s) in collaboration with the research partner
- » Follow all applicable privacy laws and regulations regarding student data
Your application should include information about your approach to handling and protecting student data, including compliance with FERPA/COPPA, your data retention policies, and/or parent/guardian consent process.
Application Evaluation Questions
-
How will applications be evaluated?
Applications will be evaluated based on:
- » Clear definition of the educational problem being addressed and its significance
- » Quality of the solution description and its alignment with evidence-based practices
- » Considerations for equitable access, especially for underserved student populations
- » Strength of the implementation plan and district partnerships
- » Approach to data collection, privacy, and evaluation
- » Organizational capacity and commitment to research
A detailed rubric is used to score applications across these areas. De-identified sections of your application may be non-evaluatively processed by a large language model. Your full submission will be reviewed and scored by human evaluators.
-
What makes for a strong application?
Strong applications typically demonstrate:
- » A clearly defined educational problem with specific evidence of its significance
- » A solution that directly addresses the problem with features grounded in learning science
- » Thoughtful consideration for equitable access and diverse student needs
- » A feasible implementation plan with confirmed district partnerships
- » Comprehensive data collection capabilities and privacy frameworks
- » A commitment to collaborating with research partners and using findings to improve the tool’s design, implementation, and effectiveness
-
We are not sure if we should apply. Can you provide more information on what would be a competitive application?
First, make sure your organization is eligible to apply by completing the Eligibility Form.
Applicants should have:
- » At a minimum, a pilot-ready, working prototype or existing tool that has preferably undergone initial testing with target users (e.g., students, teachers), even if not yet implemented in the intended school setting
- » A clear theory of action for how the technology addresses an educational challenge
The capacity to implement in at least two districts (or a strong justification for single-district implementation) - » A willingness to participate in research activities and share data
Contact and Support
-
I’m having issues with Temelio, who can I contact?
Please email program@accelerate.us with a description of the issue you are experiencing. Our team will be closely monitoring the inbox and will provide support as needed.
-
Where can we learn more?
For more details about the Call for Effective Technology grant program, including eligibility requirements, funding priorities, and additional information, please visit our website at https://accelerate.us/cet-application/.
-
Who can we contact with questions?
Questions may be emailed to program@accelerate.us at any time. Our team will be closely monitoring the inbox and will provide support as needed.